Not an entry...

[swestrup]

This is a table I tried to put in a comment, but it was too big. So I'm putting it here, and pointing to it in my comment. So there.

Service		Full Name	Bandwidth in Mbit/sec
			Download	Upload
V.90		CCITT Specification V.90	.056
ISDN		Integrated System Digital Subscriber	.064
_DSL		Digital Subscriber Line
	IDSL	ISDN-like DSL	.144	.144
	ADSL Lite (G.lite)	Asynchronous DSL Lite	1	.128
	SDSL	Symmetric DSL	1.1	1.1
	UDSL	Universal DSL	2	2
	ADSL	Asynchronous DSL	9	1
	RADSL	Rate-Adaptive DSL	12	1
	VDSL	Very-High-Speed DSL (Requires Fibre)	52	2.3
T1		Trunk line Type 1(24 x 64 Kbits/sec)	1.544
E1		European Trunk (32 x 64 Kbits/sec)	2.048
T3		Trunk line Type 3	45
OC-n		Optical Carrier	n * OC-1
	OC-1	OC Level 1	51.84
	OC-3	OC Level 3	155.52
	OC-12	OC Level 12	622.08
	OC-24	OC Level 24	1,244.16
	OC-48	OC Level 48	2,488.28
	OC-192	OC Level 192	9,953.28
STS-n		Synchronous Transport Signal	OC-n
STM-n		Synchronous Transport Module	n * OC-3
	STM-1	STM Level 1	155.52
	STM-2	STM Level 2	311.04

Comments

[zadcat.livejournal.com]

Experience has been that lj doesn't like tables. I don't know why, but my attempts and friends' attempts to add even simple tables to lj postings has caused unpredictable results.

now that's complete

[denizsarikaya.livejournal.com]

Okay, all in one place. Nice.

Translate it into Portugese, okay? *g*

Yeesh!

[swestrup]

I hadn't even finished editing the table and there were two comments about it! Don't you folks have anything else TO DO??
:-)

...says the guy knee deep in deadlines who just spent 2 hours formatting a %$@#!! table...

[sps.livejournal.com]

Hell no... it's this or debugging....

[denizsarikaya.livejournal.com]

... or re-architecting or something. grrrr...

[sps.livejournal.com]

...me sorry...