![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The dang livejournal system kept saying it had taken my journal entry, but wouldn't show it, even after I re-entered it. When I asked to edit the last entry submitted, it showed the entry before. Okay, maybe its my machine. So I reboot, log back on, re-enter the text, and resubmit it. No dice. Try again. NOW there are FOUR copies of the damn thing! Okay, no problem, I'll just erase three of them. Ask to edit the last entry. Nope, its never seen any of the four copies. So, I'm just going to go to bed now, and I assume, whatever the dang system says, that this message will eventually show up explaining what happened.
So Stephen's theory is
Date: 2003-05-24 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-24 05:52 pm (UTC)Also, if you're not a paid member, it's nearly guaranteed it'll take a while before you'll see the updates. There's a hierarchy in speed on servers, with paid members getting access to faster ones.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-24 07:50 pm (UTC)But probably this thing is based on "standard" (i.e. wildly inefficient and grossly unsuitable) technology.
-grumpy me
this is unusual
Date: 2003-05-24 07:56 pm (UTC)If you check out http://status.livejournal.com/, you'll see them explaining that stuff is going wrong in the usual, customer service, understated way.
From my perspective, something is wrong with either the load balancers or the databases or something. Coz this is pretty ridiculous. Even the paid users are getting poor response right now.
this is unusual
Date: 2003-05-24 07:58 pm (UTC)If you check out http://status.livejournal.com/, you'll see them explaining that stuff is going wrong in the usual, customer service, understated way.
From my perspective, something is wrong with either the load balancers or the databases or something. Coz this is pretty ridiculous. Even the paid users are getting poor response right now.
Oh, the status message has changed. Before, it was talking about how things had been bad, they'd found the probs in the servers and it would hopefully get fixed soon, but don't be surprised at continuing delays. Yeah, you get the drift.
no subject
Date: 2003-05-24 08:19 pm (UTC)I suppose it could be worse. But... it's a philosophical dog, as far as I can see, I can't imagine that it could really be made scalable no matter what you did.
this is unusual
Date: 2003-05-24 07:59 pm (UTC)If you check out http://status.livejournal.com/, you'll see them explaining that stuff is going wrong in the usual, customer service, understated way.
From my perspective, something is wrong with either the load balancers or the databases or something. Coz this is pretty ridiculous. Even the paid users are getting poor response right now.
Oh, the status message has changed. Before, it was talking about how things had been bad, they'd found the probs in the servers and it would hopefully get fixed soon, but don't be surprised at continuing delays. Yeah, you get the drift.
Oh, my, I just got a "database unavailable" message while trying to post this comment. Yep, things seem to be spectacularly FUBARed.