Undocumented Changes.
Dec. 30th, 2008 06:27 pmHere's another Linux Pet Peeve. I've been writing them down here to document them, since when I'm not actively working on a Linux system I don't remember them. Then way I say to someone "Linux still doesn't seem ready for Prime Time", they want examples. (Of course when I CAN give examples, as I've been doing, they usually respond with "Oh, that's only an issue with P on distro Q. Use distro R and you won't have that." which, naturally, ignores the hundreds of issues that distro Q has...
In any case, I expect to spend all day trying to configure MLDonkey on my box. Its the 'default' P2P file service on Debian KDE. It comes with a set of documentation that is horribly broken. Mostly that's because the package, as shipped by Debian, uses none of the configuration or setup methods documented by the package. It seems the Debian folks have decided to use some other homebrew method of setting it up and/or configuring it, none of which work, and none of which they have documented. Certainly the install wizard that came with the debian package fails spectacularly.
See, here's a real problem with the Linux community in general. They assume you'll use a command-line system to install everything since everyone is intimately familiar with every subsystem a package could touch, and how to make them play nicely. The GUI is added as an afterthought, is seldom tested, and is often horribly broken in a large number of ways. Now even this, I could live with, if the documentation that accompanied the package for the CLI install (and which is absolutely required from the command line -- you could get away without it if the GUI "just worked") was A) present and B) accurate. Often it manages to be neither which is quite a feat when you think about it.
In any case, I expect to spend all day trying to configure MLDonkey on my box. Its the 'default' P2P file service on Debian KDE. It comes with a set of documentation that is horribly broken. Mostly that's because the package, as shipped by Debian, uses none of the configuration or setup methods documented by the package. It seems the Debian folks have decided to use some other homebrew method of setting it up and/or configuring it, none of which work, and none of which they have documented. Certainly the install wizard that came with the debian package fails spectacularly.
See, here's a real problem with the Linux community in general. They assume you'll use a command-line system to install everything since everyone is intimately familiar with every subsystem a package could touch, and how to make them play nicely. The GUI is added as an afterthought, is seldom tested, and is often horribly broken in a large number of ways. Now even this, I could live with, if the documentation that accompanied the package for the CLI install (and which is absolutely required from the command line -- you could get away without it if the GUI "just worked") was A) present and B) accurate. Often it manages to be neither which is quite a feat when you think about it.
Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 12:23 am (UTC)Are you nuts? Seldom tested? That's a joke. Vista is a pale imitation of Compiz. I use KDE but even Gnome and Fluxbox are better than XP. I've used all four. I'm lazy and I don't care for constant maintenance of my computer, that's way canned XP in favor of Linux. That's why I use Linux because XP is not ready for Prime Time. Any OS that needs auxiliary software to keep it safe on the Internet is not ready for the desktop. I know everyone thinks it is normal, but it's not. Vista is better but it's not there yet.
Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 12:33 am (UTC)Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 05:12 am (UTC)Look, something documented is better than nothing documented. At least, under Linux, if I care enough I can C-A-F1 and speak to the O/S. And when I do tat, things are modular enough to figure out. Under Windows, you are just permanently SOL. Apparently, by design. I mean help (whether at the command line or interactively), unlike man, tells you nothing about the registry, and no only that but the registry seems to have been built without a permissions model to prevent subsystems hijacking each other. And you say this is good? I dunno, man....
Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 05:26 am (UTC)By default, Windows does things the GUI way and Linux the command line way. In both cases, when nothing works, you need the docs. But with Linux, even when it all works perfectly you still NEED the docs.
Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 05:30 am (UTC)Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 05:29 am (UTC)Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 05:34 am (UTC)I think it just sucks differently.
(Speaking of sucking, have I worked it out correctly that Rex : Regina :: VAX : VAGINA ????)
Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 05:45 am (UTC)Yes, and Linda informs me that Fax : Fagina as well...
Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 05:26 pm (UTC)Re: Not ready for Prime Time.
Date: 2008-12-31 08:38 pm (UTC)You're confused.
Date: 2009-01-01 09:41 pm (UTC)Re: You're confused.
Date: 2009-01-01 09:51 pm (UTC)Try installing a fresh installation of any distro (your choice) and set it up exactly as yours is now, without ever touching a command line. I seriously doubt you could do it.
I use the command line exactly ONCE.
Date: 2009-01-02 03:24 am (UTC)