Brent Allsop here, one of the guys working on the Canonizer.
First, thanks for the plug!
sps, yes, there definitely isn’t much data yet entered. Only a few empty test structures.
If you wanted to enter stuff like: 'god is unique by construction, is theologically and psychologically relevant, exists in the sense of mathematics, and by definition does not exist in the sense of physics' you could always do it entirely on it’s own branch in the structure. The only reason you would add it to some existing structure, was if you wanted your support of your topic to also roll up and to also count as support of the parent topics.
The idea is for ideas with lots of support to move higher in the structure and become more well accepted, while all the less well accepted and more controversial ideas move down or to less supported “camps”.
Also, I’d love to hear more about these “publicly-created ontologies” and your “real-life tech-graph project”.
I love anything to do with any of this stuff, and can’t get enough of it all. So I’d love to here more of your ideas and or questions.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Thanks for the Canonizer plug
Date: 2007-09-03 03:21 am (UTC)First, thanks for the plug!
sps, yes, there definitely isn’t much data yet entered. Only a few empty test structures.
If you wanted to enter stuff like: 'god is unique by construction, is theologically and psychologically relevant, exists in the sense of mathematics, and by definition does not exist in the sense of physics' you could always do it entirely on it’s own branch in the structure. The only reason you would add it to some existing structure, was if you wanted your support of your topic to also roll up and to also count as support of the parent topics.
The idea is for ideas with lots of support to move higher in the structure and become more well accepted, while all the less well accepted and more controversial ideas move down or to less supported “camps”.
Also, I’d love to hear more about these “publicly-created ontologies” and your “real-life tech-graph project”.
I love anything to do with any of this stuff, and can’t get enough of it all. So I’d love to here more of your ideas and or questions.
Thanks!
Brent Allsop