Thinking about Sex.
Oct. 7th, 2004 02:17 amSo, I've been trying to form an opinion on why sex evolved anyway. A quick review of the literature shows that there are at least 15 competing theories on the matter. Some facts I have learned are:
I'm still not sure what this has to do with single- vs multicellular life but it may simply be that most niches that are more easily exploited by multicellular forms are the kind that change too rapdily to be survivable in the long term by asexual forms.
Or am I out to lunch?
- Sexual reproduction is quite "expensive" compared to Asexual methods.
- sex accelerates the rate of gene mixing within a species.
- There are MANY species that are asexual, so its clear that sex is not always a winning solution.
- The rise of multicellular life happened not long after sex was invented.
- Many asexual species seem to have remained unchanged from the dawn of life.
I'm still not sure what this has to do with single- vs multicellular life but it may simply be that most niches that are more easily exploited by multicellular forms are the kind that change too rapdily to be survivable in the long term by asexual forms.
Or am I out to lunch?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 05:27 am (UTC)You notice that multicellularity is a mechanism that slows down the rate at which sex occurs, by ensuring that one fuck produces many clones - that those clones then differentiate wildly is a second, perhaps opportunistic, layer.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 09:09 am (UTC)