Namenclature.
Its difficult talking about folks when everyone has the same first name. I once worked in a company with three guys named Mike in the same small department. They ended up being called Mike A, Mike B, and Mike C, since their last initials were A, B and C. I don't even remember who Mike A was, but I'm still friends with Mike B and run into Mike C on rare occasions.
In a similar vein, I currently know 4 folks with the first name of 'Peter' or some varient. Luckily (?) two are french, one is english and one is spanish, so a first cut can reduce them to 2 Pierres, one Peter and one Pedro. But what about the Pierres? (Okay, its true that
cpirate is also a Peter, but I don't know any funny stories about him.)
Lately I've often had to stop and point out that when I am telling a funny story about Pierre, it either IS, or ISN'T
pphaneuf. Obviously, a naming convention is needed. At first, it was proposed that I refer to them as 'Pants-On Pierre" and "Pants-Off Pierre", which would seem to be a distinguishing characteristic. I have seen both without pants, but only one of them has graced the main page of a website dedicated to pantslessness.
The trouble, of course, is that these are cumbersome phrases and in both cases the initals are P.O.P. An alternative then would be to use the P+P for Pants-On Pierre and P-P for Pants-Off Pierre. Of course, then one is tempted to do the math and end up with 2P and 0 as the identifiers, which don't seem to work as well.
Then again, a bit more math gives us Plogp2 and P-∞ which may or may not be better...
In a similar vein, I currently know 4 folks with the first name of 'Peter' or some varient. Luckily (?) two are french, one is english and one is spanish, so a first cut can reduce them to 2 Pierres, one Peter and one Pedro. But what about the Pierres? (Okay, its true that
Lately I've often had to stop and point out that when I am telling a funny story about Pierre, it either IS, or ISN'T
The trouble, of course, is that these are cumbersome phrases and in both cases the initals are P.O.P. An alternative then would be to use the P+P for Pants-On Pierre and P-P for Pants-Off Pierre. Of course, then one is tempted to do the math and end up with 2P and 0 as the identifiers, which don't seem to work as well.
Then again, a bit more math gives us Plogp2 and P-∞ which may or may not be better...
no subject
My favourite solution to the problem of having too many Peters is having Pete, RePete, and then ThreePete. I don't know what you'd do after 3 though.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
oeuf ( like an egg in french :P )
or something
no subject
*whips out uuidgen (or guidgen.exe, for those so inclined)*
Re: *whips out uuidgen (or guidgen.exe, for those so inclined)*
Re: *whips out uuidgen (or guidgen.exe, for those so inclined)*
Re: *whips out uuidgen (or guidgen.exe, for those so inclined)*