FYI

[swestrup]

This, it turns out, is NOT the best weather to be wearing two pairs of socks, underwear, long underwear, jeans, a long-sleeved shirt, jeans jacket, winter coat, toque, snood, and two pairs of gloves, all zipped up as tight as possible and all seams covered with a layer or two of duct tape. Oh, and safety goggles.

I think I'll just go over here now and melt for a bit.

Edit: For those wondering WTF, see Taxlady's Post

Comments

[sps.livejournal.com]

You interest me, sir.

[thebabynancy.livejournal.com]

oooookay then.

[swestrup]

It was an impromptu prophylactic. I think it worked.

[baronscartop.livejournal.com]

Some of us knew this without feeling the need to put it to the test.

t!

[swestrup]

Aristotle once said that it was obvious that large rocks fell faster than small rocks. It was 1500 years before Galileo thought to test it.

Empiricism is important!

[sps.livejournal.com]

Well, but they do. Don't they?

[swestrup]

Not to a degree that Aristotle could have measured.

[grimmwire.livejournal.com]

You're just so far ahead of the fashion trends. Next summer, Paris and Milan will be all about duct tape, toques and safety goggles.

[sps.livejournal.com]

Really? The back of my envelope predicts that even for nicely shaped objects, they only have to fall for a few seconds before drag becomes a significant factor. If he can find a 150-200m cliff...? Or have I lost an order of magnitude somewhere?

[swestrup]

Large rocks fall slower, due to drag, don't they? Drag increases by the square of the cross-sectional area, IIRC.

I thought you meant the increase due to the gravitational field of the falling rock, in a vacuum.

[sps.livejournal.com]

I thought drag was roughly (r^2)(v^3). In any case, the question is one of whether Aristotle had a good enough theory of atmosphere to abstract it away from his theory of falling. Absent that, it's slanderous to accuse him of being wrong if he folds drag into his theory, don't you think? My overall impression of the ancients is that they had good measurements, but weak theory.

[swestrup]

Aristotle's main problem was that he thought that his theory was so good that he need not ever take measurements. He believed that pure thought was sufficient and that ever checking or testing anything was a betrayal of that.

[designergirl.livejournal.com]

Why not just call someone to come out and get rid of the wasp nest for you? Make them wear all of that gear! Heheh!

[swestrup]

I would, but they'd end up asking for *money*!

[http://users.livejournal.com/_grey_knight/]

You mean they wouldn't do it for the thrill of it? I would have...Sorta.

Did I ever tell you about the spider we had up in Laval? Foot span as large as the palm of my hand, and it made the dead leaves on the ground rustle when it scuttled away... it cleared out all the other little spiders in the area...

[swestrup]

Hadn't heard the spider story, but spiders are mostly welcome here at our place, so long as they aren't deadly.